Selected official milestones, with legal status, source dates and practical research steps. Connect the policy change to the jurisdiction and activity you are researching.
8 selected milestones8 jurisdictions covered1 Nov 2026 latest source review
Article 143(2) addresses crypto-assets other than asset-referenced tokens and e-money tokens that were admitted to trading before 30 December 2024. Where MiCA requires a white paper, trading-platform operators must ensure it is drawn up, notified, published and updated under the relevant provisions by 31 December 2027.
Source publication
Not specified in the cited source
Specified legacy white-paper deadline
31 Dec 2027
Source reviewed
1 Nov 2026
Practical impact
This is a defined legacy-admission provision, not a universal deadline for every token or a continuation of the expired service-provider transition. The token category, admission history and applicable requirement must be checked separately.
What to check
For an affected platform, inventory legacy admissions and record the evidence for category, admission date and white-paper responsibility. Check the underlying legal requirements before deciding that an asset is within scope or that an existing document is sufficient.
Germany’s Federal Finance Ministry published updated income-tax guidance for certain crypto-assets on 6 March 2025, replacing its 2022 letter. The update expands discussion of cooperation and recordkeeping, tax reports and valuation questions. The ministry expressly says NFTs and liquidity mining are not yet covered by this guidance.
Source publication
6 Mar 2025
Guidance published
6 Mar 2025
Source reviewed
1 Nov 2026
Practical impact
A software-generated tax report should be supported by an inspectable acquisition and transaction history. The document’s scope also leaves some arrangements requiring separate analysis; its existence is not a complete answer for every digital-asset activity.
What to check
Preserve original exports, acquisition evidence, euro valuations and the assumptions behind any report. Reconcile transfers and asset quantities before reviewing classifications, and flag activities outside the guidance for further advice. Treat the publication date as a guidance milestone, not an invented new tax commencement date.
Each record separates the source’s publication date, the relevant effective date or milestone, and the date CryptoGov reviewed it. Practical impact and next steps are editorial research prompts. An effective-date label applies to the stated measure, not to every service offered in a jurisdiction.
We link to regulators and other primary authorities. A blank date is left unspecified instead of inferred. Country coverage is selective, and records are not automatically refreshed. Check the current official text and later amendments for the service, customer location and entity involved.
