Selected official milestones, with legal status, source dates and practical research steps. Connect the policy change to the jurisdiction and activity you are researching.
8 selected milestones8 jurisdictions covered1 Nov 2026 latest source review
Article 143(2) addresses crypto-assets other than asset-referenced tokens and e-money tokens that were admitted to trading before 30 December 2024. Where MiCA requires a white paper, trading-platform operators must ensure it is drawn up, notified, published and updated under the relevant provisions by 31 December 2027.
Source publication
Not specified in the cited source
Specified legacy white-paper deadline
31 Dec 2027
Source reviewed
1 Nov 2026
Practical impact
This is a defined legacy-admission provision, not a universal deadline for every token or a continuation of the expired service-provider transition. The token category, admission history and applicable requirement must be checked separately.
What to check
For an affected platform, inventory legacy admissions and record the evidence for category, admission date and white-paper responsibility. Check the underlying legal requirements before deciding that an asset is within scope or that an existing document is sufficient.
The AMF confirms that the French transitional period ran until 1 July 2026 and is now over. A former national registration alone is insufficient for continuing crypto-asset services. The current basis must be MiCA authorisation or the applicable completed notification route for eligible financial entities.
Source publication
6 Jul 2026
Transitional deadline
1 Jul 2026
Source reviewed
1 Nov 2026
Practical impact
An old PSAN registration announcement can be accurate as history while failing to establish the provider’s present operating basis. Investors and counterparties need to connect the current entity and service to the appropriate official record.
What to check
Recheck the contracting company, authorised services and any relevant cross-border route. Preserve the current register evidence with the agreement and investigate mismatches before funding an account. Firms should ensure that customer-facing claims reflect their present status rather than the former transitional arrangement.
Each record separates the source’s publication date, the relevant effective date or milestone, and the date CryptoGov reviewed it. Practical impact and next steps are editorial research prompts. An effective-date label applies to the stated measure, not to every service offered in a jurisdiction.
We link to regulators and other primary authorities. A blank date is left unspecified instead of inferred. Country coverage is selective, and records are not automatically refreshed. Check the current official text and later amendments for the service, customer location and entity involved.
